High Court of Australia

Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock [2007] HCA 60

232 CLR 245; 82 ALJR 303; 241 ALR 468

13 Dec 2007

Case Number: A21/2007


Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Heydon JJ


Defamation – Defences – Fair comment – Promotion of a future edition of a television programme alleged to be defamatory – Defendant pleaded fair comment on a matter of public interest – Whether the allegedly defamatory statements constituted fact or comment – Distinction between fact and comment – Whether the facts on which the comments were alleged to be based were sufficiently identified – Construction of the rule from Pervan v North Queensland Newspaper Co Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 309 – Relevance of imputations conveyed by the promotion – Whether the alleged comments were fair – Whether reasonableness is a requirement of fairness.

Defamation – Pleading and practice – Whether defence of fair comment should have been struck out – Whether defendant should be given an opportunity to re-plead defence of fair comment.

Words and phrases – "comment", "fact", "fair", "imputation", "substratum of fact", "sufficiently indicated".

PDF MD5: bd08d550a2a378e848f29b0cffc4a733
RTF MD5: 2b0bc2ae290994c5164876bff7a31946