High Court of Australia

AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 30

2 Sep 2015

Case Number: S54/2015 S55/2015 S56/2015

Before

French CJ, Kiefel, Gageler, Keane, Nettle JJ

Catchwords

Intellectual property – Patents – Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – Inventive step – Obviousness – Patent disclosing method of treatment for hypercholesterolemia – Administration of rosuvastatin and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts at low dosage range in claims – Whether invention obvious in light of common general knowledge together with two prior art documents considered separately where another prior art document disclosed alternative compound – Whether prior art documents were ascertained, understood and regarded by person skilled in relevant art as relevant – Whether permissible to use information from other documents to determine relevance of information in prior art document – Use of prior art not within common general knowledge.

Words and phrases – "ascertained, understood and regarded as relevant", "considered separately", "inventive step", "obviousness", "person skilled in the relevant art".

Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – s 7(2), (3), s 18(1)(b).
PDF   RTF



PDF MD5: 2e2fda799ec6454d600683ffa1856b63
RTF MD5: f5400d84c244c0d51e5638c3306c3d0d