High Court of Australia

McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52

8 Nov 2018

Case Number: S121/2018


Kiefel CJ, Bell, Keane, Nettle, Edelman JJ


Evidence – Criminal trial – Sexual offences – Tendency evidence – Admissibility – Where appellant acolyte and complainant altar boy – Where appellant alleged to have followed complainant into church's public bathroom and committed offences – Where evidence that appellant, while working as an assistant housemaster, sexually offended against homesick boarding students who sought out appellant in private bedroom led as tendency evidence – Where tendency expressed as appellant having sexual interest in young teenage boys under his supervision and to act on that interest – Where tendency evidence of acts occurring ten years before offences charged – Where no evidence other than complainant's evidence that appellant had offended again in ten year period – Where tendency evidence unchallenged in cross-examination – Whether tendency evidence possessed significant probative value.

Words and phrases – "sexual interest", "significant probative value", "tendency evidence", "tendency expressed at a high level of generality", "tendency to act in a particular way", "tendency to have a particular state of mind".

Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – ss 97, 101.

PDF MD5: 6e5de3b73f31e6d3d9da240278f1db9c
RTF MD5: 9c41aa1ea57396bd7e18224949ad6a0f