High Court of Australia

Brisbane City Council v Amos [2019] HCA 27

4 Sep 2019

Case Number: B47/2018


Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Edelman JJ


Limitation of actions – Debts created by statute – Debts secured by charge – Where Council commenced proceeding against respondent for overdue rates and charges – Where overdue rates and charges secured by charge – Where respondent argued claim was an action to recover a sum recoverable by virtue of an enactment under s 10(1)(d) of Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld) – Where Council argued claim was an action to recover a principal sum of money secured by a charge and subject to s 26(1) of the Act – Where proceeding falls within both ss 10(1)(d) and 26(1) – Whether s 26(1) applies to exclude operation of s 10(1)(d).
Words and phrases – "Barnes v Glenton", "claim in rem", "limitation of actions", "overlap between limitation periods", "personal claim", "real claim", "sums secured by mortgage or charge", "what claims are within limitation statutes".
Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld), ss 10(1)(d), 26(1).

PDF MD5: 8c1a6d42a016d350f2476c1ac6edd1ef
RTF MD5: 43b050156ccbad00b38c528e30be5f80